Merging Legal English Vocabulary Learning with Speaking Activities for International Business Law Students at Hanoi Law University

Nguyen Thi Huong Lan, Hoàng Thi Hien

Abstract


The teaching of vocabulary is crucial in the pedagogy of legal English; thus, to improve efficacy, educators must not only grasp the challenges students encounter with legal terminology but also comprehend the attributes of legal terms to implement suitable solutions. Only through this method can students retain and improve their language abilities and gain proficiency in fluent legal English conversation. This study examines the integration of vocabulary instruction with speaking activities to enhance students’ retention of legal terminology. The research was carried out in two classes, namely the 50212 and 50213 cohorts of the International Business Law (IBL) department, in which the former was labelled the experimental group and the latter, the control. The research was conducted during the initial seven weeks of the first semester of the 2024-2025 academic year. There were five tests applied to measure learners’ capacity in memorizing taught legal terms in both the short-  and long term.  A pre-test (Test Number 1 – TN01) and a post-est (TN05) were launched in the second week and seventh week, repectively, while three experimental procedural tests (TN03, TN04 & Tn05) were conducted in the third, fourth and fifth weeks, respectively.  The findings reveal that the implementation of speaking activities in the vocabulary instruction process resulted in higher average scores for students in the experiment group (the class 50212) regarding vocabulary retention length after seven weeks.

 


Keywords


instructing vocabulary, learning vocabulary, speaking activities, legal English terminology, students’ retention

Full Text:

PDF

References


Areward, S., & I. S. P. Nation (1991). Fluency improvement in a second language. RELC Journal, 22(1), 84-94.

Joe, A. (1994). The effect of text-based tasks on incidental vocabulary learning. https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/24758

Lan, N.T.H. (2023). Intergrating Nation’s four strands in teaching Legal English vocabulary to arouse learners’ interest – An empirical at Hanoi Law University. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), 709-727.

Maurice, K. (1993). The fluency workshop. TESOL Newsletter, 17, 29.

Maximo, R. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context/keyword method on retention of vocabulary in EFL classroom. Language Learning, 50(2), 385-412.

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. L2 Vocabulary Acquisition, Language and Use, 57-78. https://www.eurosla.org/monographs/EM02/Milton.pdf

Nation, P., & Newton, J. M. (2017). Vocabulary learning and speaking activities. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312230524.

Newton, J. (1995). Task-based interaction and incidental vocabulary learning: A case study. Second Language Research, 11(2), 159 – 177.

Northcott, J. (2008). Language education for law professionals . In J. Gibbons & M.T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics (pp.27-45), John Benjamin Publishing.. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/14775/1/93%20pdf.pdf

Schane, S. (2006). Language and the law. UCSD Linguistics. https://idiom.ucsd.edu/~schane/law/introduction.pdf

Schmitt, N., Dunn, K., O’Sullivan, B., Anthony, L., & Kremmel, B. (2021). Introducing knowledge-based vocabulary lists. Tesol Journal, 2(4)/e622. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.622

Simcock, M. (1993). Developing productive vocabulary using the ‘Ask and answer’ technique, Guideline 15, pp. 1-7. https://tereomaori.tki.org.nz/Teacher-tools/Te-Whakaipurangi-Rauemi/Examples-of-learner-strategies

Thorbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. MFT Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639