Training of 'Body Language and Public Speaking' and Pupil’s Disruptive Behaviour
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze students' disruptive behaviour and teacher trainee’s responses before and after a Body Language and to Speak in Public training module for school teachers at the end of initial training physical education teachers (PET). A quasi experimental research is used to find out the effect of Language and to Speak in Public training on students’ disruptive behaviours. A sample of 389 students; 243 males and 146 females participated in this study along with 20 trainee teachers; 10 (6 males and 4females) who constitute the control group while 10 (5males and 5females) make the experimental group. The investigators have adapted Brunelle’s Disciplinary Incidents Observation System (DIOS) and used Sony model 4K Handcam cameras with builtin projector and a BoomTone DJ wireless microphone equipped with a transceiver to detect and record students’ disruptive behaviours, respectively. Findings reveal that the courses directed by trainee students during work readiness internships show a high degree of disruption, since there is a rate of 1.3 and 1.01 DB per minute. The frequency of onset of disruptive behaviours (DB1 and DB2) is slightly lower in sessions facilitated by trainees who have been trained in "Body language and public speaking". Similarly, at the level of disruptive behaviours (DB3), the trainees who underwent the training realized more significant decrease in the frequency of appearance of these behaviours. Faced with these disruptive behaviours, the trainees who attended the training were slightly more interactive in their reactions during the sessions. Findings constitute a repertory index to perceive the different disruptive behaviors of students and the reactions of trainee students to these behaviors. Therefore, the results of this study are worthy in bridging the existing potential gap and strengthening the perspective the researchers have put forward.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.12.6.1
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amamou, S., Desbiens, J. F., Spallanzani, C., & Vandercleyen, F. (2017). La perception du sentiment d'efficacité personnelle à gérer la classe par des enseignants stagiaires au milieu de leur formation en éducation physique. [The perception of a sense of personal effectiveness in managing the classroom by student teachers in the midst of their physical education training.] Revue PhénEps, 9(1), 1-18.
Bangir Alpan, G., Özer, A., Koç Erdamar, G., & Subasi, G. (2014). The development of a student teacher concerns scale.
Boizumault, M. (2013). Les communications non verbales des enseignants d’Education Physique et Sportive : Formes et fonctions des CNV, croyances et réalisation effective des enseignants, ressenti des effets par les élèves [Non-verbal communications of teachers of Physical and Sports Education: Forms and functions of NVCs, beliefs and effective achievement of teachers, felt effects by students.] (Doctoral thesis). Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1.
Beckers, J. (2009). Learn from their professional action and from their reflection on this action. Retrieved from http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/21230/2/Communication%20IFRES%202009.pdf
Beckers, J. (2012). Competency-based approach and reduction of inequalities between pupils: from the analysis of school situations to teacher training. Pédagogies en développement.
Blais, M., & Martineau, S. (2006). The General Inductive Analysis: Description of an Effort to Make Sense of the Raw Data. Qualitative Research, 26, 1-18.
Brunelle, J., Brunelle, J. P., Gagnon, J., Goyette, R., Martel, D., Marzouk, A., & Spallanzani, C. (1993). Système d'observation d'incidents disciplinaire (SOID) [Disciplinary Incident Observation System (DIOS)]. Québec: L'intervention éducative, Département d'éducation physique, Université Laval.
Charles, C.M. (1997). La discipline en classe : Modèles, doctrines et conduites [Discipline in the Classroom: Models, Doctrines and Behaviors]. Montréal : Éditions du Renouveau Pédagogique Inc.
Cicurel, F. (2011). De l’analyse des interactions en classe de langue à l’agir professoral : une recherche entre linguistique interactionnelle, didactique et théories de l'action [From the analysis of interactions in language class to teaching action: a research between interactional linguistics, didactics and theories of action]. Paris: Didier.
Clément, R., & Noels, K. (2006). Social communication: Interpersonal and intergroup aspects, The foundations of social psychology. Quebec: Gaëtan Morin Editor.
Desbiens, J. F., Lanoue, S., Turcotte, S., Tourigny, J. S., & Spallanzani, C. (2009). Perception de la fréquence d’apparition des comportements perturbateurs par des stagiaires en enseignement de l’éducation physique et à la santé (ÉPS). [Perception of the frequency of occurrence of disruptive behaviors by trainees in physical education and health education (PSE)]. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 12(2), 179–193.
Desbiens, J. F., Spallanzani, C., Turcotte, S., Roy, M., Lanoue, S., & Tourigny, J. S. (2014). A multi-referenced analysis of the quality of learning climate in health and physical education student teaching. Sport Science Review, 23(5–6), 175–204. Doi: 10.1515/ssr-2015-0001.
Dostie, S. (1996). Analysis of disciplinary incidents experienced by physical educators in elementary school thesis). University of Quebec.
Hodges Kulinna, P., Cothran, C. J., & Regualos, R. (2006). Teachers’ reports of student misbehavior in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,77(1), 32-40.
Maddeh, T., Hermessi, S., Bennour, N., & Souissi, N. (2015a). Student teachers’ reactions responding to students’ disruptive behaviors: A case study in high school education in Tunisia. Creative Education, 6, 1121–1128.
Maddeh, T., Bennour, N., & Souissi, N. (2015b). Study of students’ disruptive behavior in high-school education in physical education classes. Advances in Physical Education (APE), 5, 143–151.
Ménard, L., Legault, F., & Dion, J. S. (2012). Impact of Teacher Training and Supervision in the Sense of Self-Efficacy of New Teachers College. Canadian Journal of Education, 35, 212-231.
Ministry of Education, Government of Quebec. (2001). The Training of Vocational Education. The Guidance, Vocational Skills.
Moulin, J-F. (2004). The silent discourse of the teaching body. The teacher's non-verbal communication in classroom practices. Carrefours de l'Education , 142-159.
Perrenoud, Ph. (2001). Develop reflective practice in the teaching profession. Professionalization and educational reason. Paris: ESF.
Provencher, G. (1983). Skills for effective pedagogical communication among teachers of vocational education. Journal of Educational Sciences.
Ria, L., Sève, C., Durand, M., & Bertone, S. (2004). Uncertainty, Contradiction and Exploration: Three Typical Experiences of Beginning Teachers in Physical Education. Review of Educational Sciences, 30, 535-554.
Richmond V. P., Wrench J. S., & Gorham J. (2001). Communication, affect, and learning in the classroom. Acton, MA: Tapestry Press.
Supaporn, S., Dodds, P., & Griffin, L. (2003). An ecological analysis of middle school misbehavior through student and teacher perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(3), 328–349.
Wahl-Alexander, Z., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2015). Influence of negotiations between pre-service teachers and pupils on instruction within multi activity and sport education units. Sport, Education and Society, 20(7), 838–854. doi:10.1080/ 13573322.2013.835257.
Whear, R., Thompson-Coon, J., Boddy, K., Ford, T., Racey, D., & Stein, K. (2013). The effect of teacher-led intervention on social and emotional behaviour in primary school children: a systematic review. British Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 383–420
Yuan, X., & Lin, C. (2012). How to deal with student misbehaviour in the classroom? Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 2(1), 143–150.
Refbacks
International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639