Measuring Student Learning Approaches and Generic Skills: A Multi-Group Analysis of Gender Differences

Sharifah Azizah Syed Sahil, Haslinawati Hassan, Wan Roslina Wan Ismail

Abstract


The present study sought to measure student learning approaches and generic skills and to determine the influence of learning approaches on the undergraduates’ generic skills. By utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), the study aimed to identify if there are any gender differences in the relations. The study adapted the Revised Approaches to Studying (RASI) (Duff, 1997) in order to measure the learning approaches and the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) (Wilson & Lizzio, 1997) to tap into the students’ generic skills. A total of 233 undergraduates from various religious studies disciplines took part in the survey. The study utilized purposive sampling in the data collection in which only final year students were sampled. Using multi-group analysis via SEM, the data showed that the models for boys and girls differed in which the girls’ surface approach negatively influenced their generic skills. Unlike the girls, the boys’ strategic and surface approaches are related to generic skills, each having a positive and negative relationship respectively.  Interestingly, the boys’ model also accounted for a higher explained variance (47%) compared to that of the girls’ (23%). A model of the relationship between the learning approaches and generic skills used was subsequently proposed.  The study uncovered how the boys’ and girls’ learning approaches may influence the teaching and learning in the classroom and on students’ generic skills, subsequently graduate employability. A number of suggestions have been forwarded so as to escalate the use of generics skills among the students of various religious studies disciplines and those of girls in particular.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.12.5.1


Keywords


generic skills; learning approaches; multi-group analysis; undergraduates

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Malek, A. K., Nabilah, A., Abdul Malek, A. R., Sidek, M. N., Wan Marzuki, W. J., Joharry, O., Lihanna, B., Jamaludin, B., & Hamdan, S. (2012). A nationwide comparative study between private and public university students’ soft skills. Asia Pacific Educ. Review, 13, 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-012-9205-1

Ahmed, M., Ahmed, S., Waheed, A., Shoaib, M., & Khan, M. (2014). Impacts of demographics

on business students’ learning. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(8), 64-77. Retrieved from https://www.ejbss.com/recent.aspx-/

Ambreen, A., & Nawaz, A. (2017). Comparative analysis of rote learning on high and low achievers in graduate and undergraduate programs. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed. v 4i1.982

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness of fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5

Beard, D., Schwieger, D., & Surendran, K. (2007). Incorporating soft skills into Accounting

and MIS Curricula. SIGMIS-CPR‟07, April 19-21, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. ACM 978-1-59593-641-7/07/0004. 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526

Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher education, 8(4), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680526

Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Using Constructive Alignment in Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd ed., pp. 50-63). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Billing, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: cognitive skills. Higher Education, 53(4), 483-516. https://doi.org/10:1007/s10734-005-5628-5

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.

Bryne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students, Accounting Education 11(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280210153254

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance, Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1596-1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003

Chiou, G. L., Liang, J. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning in Biology: A study of their structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education 34(2), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.558131

Dart, B., Burnett, P., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262-270. https://doi: 10.1080/00220670009598715

Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle & Tait’s Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 52-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/8279.1997.tb01263.x

Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Ferguson, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approach to learning and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1907-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/.2003.08.020

Entwistle, N. J. (1987). A model of the teaching-learning process. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.). Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 13–28). London: S.R.H.E./Open University Press.

Entwistle, N. J. (2000). Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education, Kybernetes, 30, 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110391823

Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873-891. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X189118

Goh, S. C. (2005). Perceptions of learning environments, learning approaches, and learning outcomes: a study of private higher education students in Malaysia from twinning programmes [Doctoral Thesis]. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/2440/37753//

Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov04/vol62/num03/With-boys-and-Girls-in-Mind.aspx

Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (2001). Approaches to learning of management accounting students. Education and Training, 43(3), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910110394071

Hazilah, M. A., Johari, J., Zaihosnita H., Saidah, S., & Hamizah, M. A. (2013). Kemahiran insaniah pelajar prasiswazah: analisis perbezaan jantina [Soft skills of undergraduate students: analysis of gender differences]. Jurnal Teknologi, 61(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v61n1.164

Ingleton, C. (1995). Gender and learning: Does emotion make a difference? Higher Education 30: 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383756

Importance of academia-universities linkages. (2019, January 23). New Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/education/2019/01/453582/importance-academia-industry-linkages

Kamarul, M. S., Farah, M., Hasnah, A., Manoriza, A. M., & Zairiniah, M. S. (2017). Kemahiran generik dan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan guru pelatih di Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia [Generic skills and academic achievement among trainee teachers at the Malaysian Institute of Teacher Education]. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 69-75. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/issue/view/981

Koh, M. Y., & Koh, H. C. (1999) The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme. Accounting Education, 8(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392899331017

Lie, L. Y., Angelique, L., & Cheong, E. (2004). How do male and female students approach learning at NUS? CDTL Brief, 7(1), 1-3. Retrieved from https://atecentral.net/downloads/4956/limyuenlie.pdf

Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. L., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice, Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359

Mariana, Y. (2008). Communication in Oral Presentation: A Malaysian Experience. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. Article number 4610248. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2008.4610248

Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044.8279.1976.tb02980.x

Masura, R., Kamsuriah, A., Sufian, I., & Noor Faridatul Ainun, Z. (2012). Relationship between employability and graduates’ skill. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.318

Mohamad Sattar, R., Md. Yusof, I., Napsiah, I., Muhammad Rashid, R., & Rose Amnah, A. R.

(2009). Peranan institusi pendidikan teknikal dalam pemupukan kemahiran employabiliti pelajar [The role of technical education institutions in nurturing student employability skills]. Jurnal Teknologi, 50, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v50.187

MQA (Malaysian Qualification Agency). (2006). Titik rujukan dan persefahaman bersama tentangkelayakan pengajian tinggi di Malaysia [Point of reference and mutual understanding abouthigher education qualifications in Malaysia]. Kuala Lumpur: Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia.

Noble, C., Brown, J., & Murphy, J. (2001). How to raise boys’ achievement. London: Fulton.

Nik Azma, W., Rahmah, I., & Ishak, Y. (2011). Analisis penentu perbezaan upah mengikut kemahiran di Malaysia [Analysis of determinants of wage differences according to skills in Malaysia]. Jurnal Teknologi, 56, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v56.57

Razali, S. (2009, July 20). Persepsi majikan terhadap graduan Pengajian Islam [Employers' perceptions of Islamic Studies graduates]. [Paper presentation]. Seminar Pengajian Islam. Bangi. UKM.

Roselina, S. (2009). Soft skills at the Malaysian institutes of higher learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(3), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9038-8

Rosima, A., Mohd Izham, M. H., & Nora, Y. (2013). Generic skills requirements between employers’ aspiration and the need of professional employees. Jurnal Pengurusan, 37, 105-114.

Ruhizan M. Y., Saemah, R., Ramlee, M., & Kamaruddin, T. (2011). Development of generic employability skills through peer interaction and contextual teaching and learning in community colleges. World Applied Sciences Journal, 15, 1-7. Retrieved from https://www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj15(IPLL)2011.htm

Ryan, M. T., Irwin, J. A., Bannon, F. J., Mulholland, C. W., & Baird, A. W. (2004). Observations of veterinary medicine students’ approaches to study in pre-clinical years. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 31(3), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.31.3.242

Severians, S. E., & Dam, G. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27(4), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384906

Sinhaneti, K., & Kyaw, E. K. (2012). A study of the role of rote learning in vocabulary learning strategies of Burmese students. (2012). US-China Education Review, 12, 987-1005. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539350.pdf

Sirat, M., Chan, L. H., Shuib, M., Rahman, A., Rahayu, S., & Singh, N. K. J. (2012). Employability of graduate in Malaysia. UNESCO: Bangkok.

Sharifah Azizah, S. S., & Haslinawati, H. (2018). Kearah kebolehpasaran graduan: pertalian antara pendekatan pembelajaran dengan kemahiran insaniah dalam kalangan IPT berteraskan Islam [Towards the marketability of graduates: the relationship between learning approaches and soft skills among Islamic-based HEIs]. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 43(2), 81-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2018-43.02

Wilson, K. L., & Lizzio, A. (1997). The development validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33-52. https://doi:10.1080/03075079712331381121

Yassin, S., Hasan, F., Amin, W., & Amiruddin. (2008, November 19-21). Implementation of generic skills in the curriculum [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 International Conference on Sustainability in Higher Education: Directions for Change, Edith Cowan University Perth, Western Australian. Retrieved from https//ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639