Perceptions and Factors Affecting the Pre-Service Teachers’ Field Study (FS) Observations
Abstract
The development of pre-service teachers to teaching career are enhance through a field study. Field study is one of the major courses of pre-service teachers in which they are exposed to teaching environment in a school setting. Pre-service teachers are exposed to different teaching-learning process in a different classrooms and class subjects to observe how teaching takes place. This study aim to gather perceptions of the pre-service teachers during their field study observations and investigate the factors that affect their field study observations through survey and descriptive research. Using structured and unstructured questionnaires, twenty five (25) students enrolled in field study 6 “On Becoming a Teacher†and field study 5 “Learning Assessment Strategies were taken as respondents of the study. From the data gathered, analysis revealed that the demographic profile of the respondents are mostly 18-20 years old, single, parents educational attainment were baccalaureate degree holder and government employee with monthly income of between 15,000-20,000 Philippine money. Upon survey and interviews all (100%) of the pre-service teachers has positive perceptions of their field study observations in which it develops their quality of becoming a teachers. However, attitudes of the cooperating teachers, time management and subject loads are the factors that affect their field study observations. Thus, this study recommended that orientations between pre-service teachers and cooperating teachers must be conducted prior to pre-service teachers’ classroom observations. Moreover, subject loads for the pre-service teachers during field study must be limited for them to focus the real teaching environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
BEAM. (2009). Training of Teachers Manual.
Bell, J. (2002). Scaffolding Literacy at Kuldarriya Community School. Kimberley Region, Western Australia.
Chester, M. D. (2013). Pre-service Performance Assessment. Guidelines for Teachers Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Retrieved from www.doe.mass.edu.
CMO. (2004).Commission on Higher Education, CMO 30 series of 2004 B.
Follers, K. (2002). The New Basic Projects: Primary Educator for Australian Curriculum Studies.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205.
Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers‟ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and teacher Education, 26(8), 1530-1543.
Ismael, S. A. A. (2011). Student Teachers Microteaching Experiences in a Pre-service English Teacher Education Program. United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1043-1051.
Karckay, A. T., & Sanli, S. (2009). The effect of microteaching application on the pre-service teachers‟ teacher competency levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 844–847.
Lu, H. L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in pre-service teacher education: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 748–753.
Mitchell, I. M., J. & McKinnon, R. (2001). Invitation to Action – 700 ideas for Quality Teaching Melbourne: PEEL Publications.
Salandanan, G. & Corpuz, R. (2012). The Teaching Profession, Quezon City, Philippines.
Valdez, A. (2017). Lived Experiences of Mentors in MOVE UPS Balabagan Lanaodel Sur. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 6(2), 1-18.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639