Multifaceted Presentation Oriented-Instruction (MPOI): Effects on Students’ Concept Learning, Achievement, and Attitude towards Chemistry

Norolayn K. Said

Abstract


Abstract. Considering multiple intelligences (MI) in the teaching-learning process may provide relevant opportunities for the students. The study investigated the effects of Multifaceted Presentation Oriented-Instruction (MPOI), an MI based teaching strategy on the students’ concept learning, achievement, and attitude towards Chemistry. Experimental method was employed and both quantitative and qualitative data were gathered. These were analyzed using t-test and Pearson product-moment correlation. Students from third year sections of MSU-Integrated Laboratory School, Marawi City served as the respondents of the study. Different dominant intelligences were observed among the respondents such as visual (28%), verbal (24%), interpersonal (24%), musical (16%) and logical (8%). Pretest mean scores on the concept learning, achievement, and the attitude of the control and experimental groups were statistically not significant at α=.05; thus, indicating that the two groups were comparable. Whereas, the mean gain scores on the concept learning and achievement as well as attitude rating scores of both groups were statistically significant at α=.05. Moreover, it was found out that there was a significant positive relationship between the students’ attitude and their achievement towards Chemistry. Finally, the students perceived MPOI as effort-requiring activity but challenging. Students under MPOI performed better in concept learning and achievement test. Further, they acquired good attitude towards Chemistry.

 

Keywords: multiple intelligences, individual differences, teaching strategy


Keywords


multiple intelligences, individual differences, teaching strategy, Noralyn K. Said MST-Science Education Mindanao State University Marawi City, Philippines

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acero, et. al. Principles and Strategies of Teaching. Rex Book Store, Manila. 2000.

Calderon, J. F., & Gonzales, E. C. Methods of research and Thesis Writing. National Book store, 1993.

Frankael & Wallen. How to Design and Evaluate Research Education. 8th Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., 2007.

Kagan, S. & Kagan, M. Multiple Intelligences: The Complete MI Book. Kagan Cooperative learning, Calle Cordillera, USA, 1998.

Hambre, M. M. The Students Perfromance in Chemistry Problem-Solving Tests on DECS-PASMEP Schools in Iligan City, Master’s Thesis, MSU Marawi, 1995.

Salandanan, G. Teaching Approaches and Strategies. Katha Publishing Co., Inc. 388 Quezon Avenue, QC 1113, 2000.

Tenedero, H. R. Breaking the IQ Myth: Learning Styles, Multiple Intelligences, and Breaktrough Teaching for a Quality Learning Environment at Home and School. Center for Learning and Teaching Styles, Pasig City. 2001.

Villaflor, E.T. Assessment Models for Quality Education. Khanser Publishing House, Quezon City, 2004.

Witty, J. Encyclopedia of Educational Research. Macmillan Co., Ontario, 1960.

Lapena, Rachel L. Practical Works Strategy in Teaching Elementary Science: Its Effects on the Performance Level of Grade VI Pupils in Iligan City Central School, Master’s Thesis, MSU Marawi, 1998.

Paiton-Tan, J. Effects of Using Scientific Models in Reconstructing Students Misconceptions on Selected Topics in Earth Science, Master’s Thesis, MSU Marawi, 2008.

Palermo, MR. Student-Constructed Comic Strip: Its Effects on Achievement and Attitude towards Chemistry, Master’s Thesis, MSU Marawi, 2001.

Hyperlinks:

Acosta, M. Multiple Intelligences Action Research, retrieved from http://www.thewritingtutor.biz/articles/MI-method-instruction2.php, July, 7, 2009.

Batomalaque, A. (2002). 1997 National Secondary Achievement Test (NSAT), retrieved from www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/pdf/09_Philippines_Antonio.pdf, August 2, 2010.

Bauer, C. F. (2002). Attitude-to-Subject-of-Chemistry-Inventory, retrieved from http://www.chemistry, November 9, 2008.

Campbell, Bruce. (2000). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom, retrieved from http://www.context.org/ICLIB/IC27/Campbell.htm., November 09, 2008.

Chickering & Gamson (1987). Constructivism. http://www.fundesrtanding.com/constructivism.cfm, retrieved May 24, 2008.

Cornwell (1998). Multiple Intelligence, retrieved from www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/op, June 28, 2010

Coustan, R. MI Theory in ESOL Classroom, retrieved from www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/op, June 28, 2010

Coztano, S. Multiple Intelligences, retrieved from www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/op, June 28, 2010

Dimagiba (2008). Constructivism in Chemistry, retrieved from http://www.philed.com, November 9, 2008.

Ebel (1980). Concept learning, retrieved from http://wiktionary.com, May 24, 2008.

Fortini (1998). Innovative thinking, retrieved from http://wiktionary.com. May 24, 2008.

Gaber (1998). Attitude, retrieved from http://www. dictionary. com, February 2, 2009.

Galdon, J. (1995). Students’ Learning Process, retrieved from http://education, learning process. html, June 28, 2009.

Gardner, Howard, et al. Integrated Learning and Multiple Intelligences, retrieved from http://www.leading-learning.co.nz/newsletters/integrated-learning.html, June 14, 2010.

Gonzales, E., et.al. (2004). TIMMS 2003 Technical Report, retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/timss2003.html, July 23, 2010.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Print version: 1694-2620
Online version: 1694-2639